🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.